FREE NEWSLETTER

Happiness lies not in the choice, but in making a decision and eliminating the uncertainty created by choice.

Latest PostsAll Discussions »

Social Security Spousal Benefits

"Rules have changed. In 2024 the GPO was eliminated so now spouses with public pensions are NOT penalized. She should definitely file for retroactive benefits as well as spousal benefits."
- James McGlynn CFA RICP®
Read more »

Wrapping It Up

"Wow, you are correct! I stopped earning when I retired midway through 2021, so I didn't bump up against this special case. Apparently SS says in that first partial year if you earn more than the monthly limit ($2,040 in 2026), then you "aren't retired"(!) so that month's benefit is indeed lost. So glad you knew that!"
- 1PF
Read more »

Any concern?

"Economic chaos is transitory, and I tend not to be concerned about it, but there's a tiny bit of stress this time because the sudden demise of my lead client is about to put a big dent in my income -- and finding new clients at 70 in this environment may be a tad challenging. But I'm not losing sleep."
- Mike Gaynes
Read more »

Private Credit Stress?

"I put private credit and private equity in my "too hard" pile. Between the opacity and the lockup periods, I can't justify the trade-off for a few (maybe) extra return points. If they get to the point that they need to raise funds from 401(k) savers, I say let them go through the public markets, with all of the associated disclosures and regulations. Most won't need them to reach their goals."
- Kenneth DeLuca
Read more »

Ninety Nine, I mean Eight Retirement Tips

"Kenneth Tobin, 1% of 1% of every line they cast, can pay for a fair amount of advertisements and mailings. "
- Michael Flack
Read more »

$3 Trillion S&P 500 Gatecrashers

HAVE YOU GIVEN any thought to what's about to happen to your S&P 500 tracker? Three enormous IPOs are expected later this year: SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic. Based on their most recent private transactions, SpaceX appears to be valued at around $1.25 trillion, OpenAI at roughly $800 billion, and Anthropic at approximately $380 billion. Combined, we could be looking at close to $3 trillion in private market value that wants to go public. To put that in perspective, the entire S&P 500 is worth roughly $60 trillion. That's not a routine year for markets. That could be a very large event indeed. I suspect the vast majority of people with money sitting in a tracker fund have absolutely no idea it's coming. Those that do might have read some of the more sensational claims I've seen about immediate, disruptive wholesale change to the S&P 500. I think those articles are getting ahead of themselves. These companies might not automatically land in your S&P 500 tracker the day they list. The index has hard rules, and two of them seem particularly relevant. A company generally needs to have been profitable for four consecutive quarters before it qualifies. OpenAI and Anthropic are both, as far as we can tell, burning through enormous amounts of capital. They may well not meet that bar at IPO. There's also a float requirement, where roughly half of a company's outstanding shares typically need to be publicly tradeable. These businesses will almost certainly debut with tiny floats, possibly somewhere between 5% and 10% of shares in public hands. That could disqualify them from day one. SpaceX is possibly the closest to profitability of the three, but the float issue likely applies across the board. One area of uncertainty is the selection committee. This has some discretion around the inclusion of larger IPOs. They could choose to move faster than the rules imply. So the story might not be your tracker being immediately and dramatically restructured. The story could be more drawn out than that, and perhaps more interesting for it. What does this mean in the short term? I can only offer informed speculation. To my mind, volatility seems likely around the listings themselves. Not necessarily because of forced index rebalancing, but because the float issue creates its own kind of pressure. Enormous companies carrying enormous implied valuations, but only a sliver of shares in circulation. Limited supply, near-unlimited institutional demand, and a market full of retail investors who've been reading about these companies for years and finally get their shot. I would guess we should expect wild price swings during those early trading days, though I could be wrong about the scale of it. Rotation risk is worth watching too, I think. Investors might pull money out of existing AI bets, the likes of Nvidia and Microsoft, and move it directly into OpenAI and Anthropic the moment they're publicly available. If that happens, the stocks that have driven your tracker's returns for the last three years could face sustained selling pressure, not because anything's wrong with those businesses, but simply because a shinier, newer version of the same trade has just arrived. A throwaway thought for anyone holding individual shares rather than trackers. The companies most at risk of ejection are those sitting at the bottom of the index. When a business loses its S&P 500 membership, every passive fund becomes an automatic seller. That can hit the share price hard, nothing wrong with the company, just forced selling as a side effect of something big happening at the very top. Worth knowing if any of those smaller names are in your portfolio. Medium term it could get more interesting still. If and when these companies do meet the profitability and float requirements, which could, I think, be years after their IPOs rather than months, every S&P 500 tracker on the planet becomes an automatic buyer. Hundreds of billions flowing into SpaceX, OpenAI and Anthropic whether fund managers want it or not. The mechanics of passive investing would turn every tracker holder into an investor in these three companies with absolutely no say in the matter. That's the bit people rarely stop to think about. Passive investing isn't neutral. It just means someone else is making your decisions for you. Then I come to the big question: do these businesses actually deserve these valuations? It's worth noting that every major IPO of recent years has tended to trade down from its private valuation once the public gets a proper look at the books. The venture capital guys who set those private prices aren't always right, and public markets have a habit of finding that out fairly quickly. If the same happens here, your tracker should hopefully be buying them at a fair price by the time they filter into the realm of inclusion within that tracker. It has to be said, that's not guaranteed. I'm not trying to be alarmist. These aren't penny stocks being hyped and I think that matters. OpenAI's revenue had already surpassed $20 billion by the end of 2025. SpaceX is targeting what could be the largest public offering in history. Anthropic has BlackRock, Blackstone, Microsoft and Nvidia on its books. These are real businesses generating real money with the biggest and most sophisticated names in global finance and technology behind them. That doesn't make them cheap at these prices, but it does make them a very different proposition from the usual IPO hype cycle. The bottom line for the average investor? We probably don't need to do anything dramatic. But it doesn't hurt to understand that the passive, set-and-forget vehicle you own may look quite different over the next few years, not necessarily in a single sudden lurch, but gradually, as these companies either earn their way into the index or don't. The index you bought into always changes but the next few years will definitely see bigger changes than normal. If nothing else, it'll be interesting to see what happens going forward…Eyes open.
Mark Crothers is a retired small business owner from the UK with a keen interest in personal finance and simple living. Married to his high school sweetheart, with daughters and grandchildren, he knows the importance of building a secure financial future. With an aversion to social media, he prefers to spend his time on his main passions: reading, scratch cooking, racket sports, and hiking.
Read more »

My Window is Open – Come In

"Thanks for writing a positive and timeless message."
- Jack Hannam
Read more »

The Bear Market Survival Kit (Pharmaceuticals Not Included)

"There will be a sizeable correction one day. You can bet on it. We each should answer the question "Are you in thought, or in action?" and you are in action."
- normr60189
Read more »

Focus on the real healthcare financial risk in post age 65 retirement

"There should be one formulary covering every FDA approved drug used for its approved purpose."
- R Quinn
Read more »

Social Security Spousal Benefits

"Rules have changed. In 2024 the GPO was eliminated so now spouses with public pensions are NOT penalized. She should definitely file for retroactive benefits as well as spousal benefits."
- James McGlynn CFA RICP®
Read more »

Wrapping It Up

"Wow, you are correct! I stopped earning when I retired midway through 2021, so I didn't bump up against this special case. Apparently SS says in that first partial year if you earn more than the monthly limit ($2,040 in 2026), then you "aren't retired"(!) so that month's benefit is indeed lost. So glad you knew that!"
- 1PF
Read more »

Any concern?

"Economic chaos is transitory, and I tend not to be concerned about it, but there's a tiny bit of stress this time because the sudden demise of my lead client is about to put a big dent in my income -- and finding new clients at 70 in this environment may be a tad challenging. But I'm not losing sleep."
- Mike Gaynes
Read more »

Private Credit Stress?

"I put private credit and private equity in my "too hard" pile. Between the opacity and the lockup periods, I can't justify the trade-off for a few (maybe) extra return points. If they get to the point that they need to raise funds from 401(k) savers, I say let them go through the public markets, with all of the associated disclosures and regulations. Most won't need them to reach their goals."
- Kenneth DeLuca
Read more »

Ninety Nine, I mean Eight Retirement Tips

"Kenneth Tobin, 1% of 1% of every line they cast, can pay for a fair amount of advertisements and mailings. "
- Michael Flack
Read more »

$3 Trillion S&P 500 Gatecrashers

HAVE YOU GIVEN any thought to what's about to happen to your S&P 500 tracker? Three enormous IPOs are expected later this year: SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic. Based on their most recent private transactions, SpaceX appears to be valued at around $1.25 trillion, OpenAI at roughly $800 billion, and Anthropic at approximately $380 billion. Combined, we could be looking at close to $3 trillion in private market value that wants to go public. To put that in perspective, the entire S&P 500 is worth roughly $60 trillion. That's not a routine year for markets. That could be a very large event indeed. I suspect the vast majority of people with money sitting in a tracker fund have absolutely no idea it's coming. Those that do might have read some of the more sensational claims I've seen about immediate, disruptive wholesale change to the S&P 500. I think those articles are getting ahead of themselves. These companies might not automatically land in your S&P 500 tracker the day they list. The index has hard rules, and two of them seem particularly relevant. A company generally needs to have been profitable for four consecutive quarters before it qualifies. OpenAI and Anthropic are both, as far as we can tell, burning through enormous amounts of capital. They may well not meet that bar at IPO. There's also a float requirement, where roughly half of a company's outstanding shares typically need to be publicly tradeable. These businesses will almost certainly debut with tiny floats, possibly somewhere between 5% and 10% of shares in public hands. That could disqualify them from day one. SpaceX is possibly the closest to profitability of the three, but the float issue likely applies across the board. One area of uncertainty is the selection committee. This has some discretion around the inclusion of larger IPOs. They could choose to move faster than the rules imply. So the story might not be your tracker being immediately and dramatically restructured. The story could be more drawn out than that, and perhaps more interesting for it. What does this mean in the short term? I can only offer informed speculation. To my mind, volatility seems likely around the listings themselves. Not necessarily because of forced index rebalancing, but because the float issue creates its own kind of pressure. Enormous companies carrying enormous implied valuations, but only a sliver of shares in circulation. Limited supply, near-unlimited institutional demand, and a market full of retail investors who've been reading about these companies for years and finally get their shot. I would guess we should expect wild price swings during those early trading days, though I could be wrong about the scale of it. Rotation risk is worth watching too, I think. Investors might pull money out of existing AI bets, the likes of Nvidia and Microsoft, and move it directly into OpenAI and Anthropic the moment they're publicly available. If that happens, the stocks that have driven your tracker's returns for the last three years could face sustained selling pressure, not because anything's wrong with those businesses, but simply because a shinier, newer version of the same trade has just arrived. A throwaway thought for anyone holding individual shares rather than trackers. The companies most at risk of ejection are those sitting at the bottom of the index. When a business loses its S&P 500 membership, every passive fund becomes an automatic seller. That can hit the share price hard, nothing wrong with the company, just forced selling as a side effect of something big happening at the very top. Worth knowing if any of those smaller names are in your portfolio. Medium term it could get more interesting still. If and when these companies do meet the profitability and float requirements, which could, I think, be years after their IPOs rather than months, every S&P 500 tracker on the planet becomes an automatic buyer. Hundreds of billions flowing into SpaceX, OpenAI and Anthropic whether fund managers want it or not. The mechanics of passive investing would turn every tracker holder into an investor in these three companies with absolutely no say in the matter. That's the bit people rarely stop to think about. Passive investing isn't neutral. It just means someone else is making your decisions for you. Then I come to the big question: do these businesses actually deserve these valuations? It's worth noting that every major IPO of recent years has tended to trade down from its private valuation once the public gets a proper look at the books. The venture capital guys who set those private prices aren't always right, and public markets have a habit of finding that out fairly quickly. If the same happens here, your tracker should hopefully be buying them at a fair price by the time they filter into the realm of inclusion within that tracker. It has to be said, that's not guaranteed. I'm not trying to be alarmist. These aren't penny stocks being hyped and I think that matters. OpenAI's revenue had already surpassed $20 billion by the end of 2025. SpaceX is targeting what could be the largest public offering in history. Anthropic has BlackRock, Blackstone, Microsoft and Nvidia on its books. These are real businesses generating real money with the biggest and most sophisticated names in global finance and technology behind them. That doesn't make them cheap at these prices, but it does make them a very different proposition from the usual IPO hype cycle. The bottom line for the average investor? We probably don't need to do anything dramatic. But it doesn't hurt to understand that the passive, set-and-forget vehicle you own may look quite different over the next few years, not necessarily in a single sudden lurch, but gradually, as these companies either earn their way into the index or don't. The index you bought into always changes but the next few years will definitely see bigger changes than normal. If nothing else, it'll be interesting to see what happens going forward…Eyes open.
Mark Crothers is a retired small business owner from the UK with a keen interest in personal finance and simple living. Married to his high school sweetheart, with daughters and grandchildren, he knows the importance of building a secure financial future. With an aversion to social media, he prefers to spend his time on his main passions: reading, scratch cooking, racket sports, and hiking.
Read more »

Free Newsletter

Get Educated

Manifesto

NO. 24: OUR ONLY earthly immortality will be the memories of others. We should make sure those memories are good—by spending our wealth on special times with friends and family.

Truths

NO. 16: WE’RE TOO self-confident. We imagine we’re smarter than other investors and can beat the market averages. This leads us to trade too much, make big investment bets and buy actively managed mutual funds. What if we’re at least partially successful? We may attribute our gains to our own brilliance—leading us to take yet more risk.

think

REAL RETURNS. Just because our investments climb in value doesn’t mean we’re making financial progress. Instead, we need to earn a “real” return—one that outpaces inflation. Over the long haul, savings accounts will deliver a negative real return, bonds should offer a modest real gain and stocks could outpace inflation by a healthy margin.

act

SUPPOSE YOU LOST your job. How long could you go before your financial life unraveled? This isn’t an issue for retirees—which is why they need little or no emergency money. But if you’re working, your plan for unemployment might include a cash reserve, slashing discretionary spending, a home equity line of credit and withdrawing Roth contributions.

Manage that tax bill

Manifesto

NO. 24: OUR ONLY earthly immortality will be the memories of others. We should make sure those memories are good—by spending our wealth on special times with friends and family.

Spotlight: Advisors

What a Drag

ONE PERCENT IS THE average annual cost charged by actively managed stock mutual funds. One percent is also the typical fee charged by financial advisors for managing a client’s portfolio. Paying 1% means keeping 99% for yourself. What’s the harm in that?
Here are some pictures of Lower Manhattan. It’s dotted with the skyscrapers that comprise the financial district, home to some of Wall Street’s largest firms. Just the seven largest U.S. banks together are worth more than $1.5 trillion (yes,

Read more »

ETFs versus Assets Under Management

Hired a  financial advisor who has claimed to be fee-only for a plan as we are 2-5 years away from retirement.  Wanted help with projections but especially with two areas:  amount and timing of conversion to Roths and 2.  real estate as we contemplate a new or second place.   Worried I received an annuity salesperson/asset manager in disguise as the first recommendation is to “simplify” our 401ks (almost all in Schwab target ETFs) with the creation of two funds—one actively managed (presumably by them) because they “can do better”

Read more »

Costs Matter

I’m sure many Humble Dollar readers have read various iterations of this innumerable times.
I was just reading Adam Grossman’s (soon to be published on the HD website) weekly email where he quotes Warren Buffet as stating, “Performance comes, performance goes. Fees never falter.”
John Bogle’s is famously quoted as saying, “You get what you don’t pay for. Costs matter.”
Yesterday I was speaking with my daughter in law about these famous quotes when urging her to investigate what her 403b fee is.

Read more »

Your Results May Vary

“SELL THE SIZZLE, BOYS.” With those words from the sales manager at a big insurance company, the 2003 class of newly minted registered representatives were off to the races, extolling the virtues of the firm’s products to family, friends and anyone else who would listen.
I still vividly remember that moment. Yes, I was there.
To become registered reps, the 2003 class had to pass the necessary exams to get a Series 6 securities license and a license to sell life and health insurance.

Read more »

Helping Out

SOME FAMILY MEMBERS recently asked me to help them find a financial advisor. As luck would have it, soon after, Barron’s published a perfectly timed article, “America’s Best RIA Firms,” which listed 100 highly ranked registered investment advisors (RIAs). Similar lists are available from CNBC and the Financial Times.
It was time for me to get to work. Who wouldn’t want to recommend a “top” firm to his or her family?

Read more »

Spotlight: Rohleder

After the Birth

CONGRATULATIONS, your family has grown with the arrival of a first child or grandchild. As the celebration subsides, reality sets in: You want to do everything you can to pave the way for a secure future. For new parents, the first step is to obtain two basic documents that’ll last a lifetime: a birth certificate and Social Security card. The hospital will start the process, but you need to be diligent. Is the name spelled correctly? Are birth dates and other data correct? A mistake now will cause problems later. Also, decide where to file these documents so you can find them when they’re needed. Next, check in with your employer’s human resources department to make sure important benefits are in place: Health-care coverage is essential. Although insurance companies have a grace period, you should add the newborn immediately after birth. Health issues in newborns can arise quickly and you don’t want to worry about coverage during a crisis. Make sure to add the baby to dental and vision insurance. Later verify everything with each insurance company. My daughter realized only at the time of her daughter’s first dentist visit that she hadn’t been added for dental coverage. If you’ll be paying for childcare, ask if your employer offers pretax payroll deductions to cover dependent care costs. Settling on the right amount requires some planning, because money contributed must be spent within a defined time frame. But depending on your tax bracket, the savings can be substantial. Check the beneficiaries on your life insurance and retirement plans. If your spouse is the primary beneficiary, it may be useful to list the contingent beneficiary as “all my children, per stirpes,” even if you currently have just one child. If you forget to review this after future births, it ensures that benefits…
Read more »

On Your Way Out

IMAGINE YOU PLAN to retire next year. What can you do beforehand to gain the most later on? Here are some ideas to consider before you log off at work for the last time. If you’re retiring mid-year, increase your 401(k) or 403(b) contributions. Raise your savings enough to make a full year’s allowable contribution in the months you have left. This may be your last chance to put away tax-deferred money. I retired mid-year, so I doubled my 403(b) deferrals. That way, I accumulated a full year’s contributions in just six months. If you contribute to a health care spending account, don’t overfill it in the year you retire. These plans are “use it or lose it.” Estimate your health costs up until retirement and don’t add any more to the health spending account than that. Know the time window for submitting claims, and act promptly so you don’t lose the money you set aside. If you have a defined benefit pension, know how much you’ll receive. The biggest advantage of a pension is that you can’t outlive it. It’s guaranteed income for life. But the payment is most likely fixed, so inflation will trim its purchasing power over time. There’s also a chance that your employer could default on its obligations. Yes, there are government protections for pensions. But they don’t make you whole if you’re owed a hefty sum—more than $5,400 a month in 2021. If this worries you, ask if you can take your pension as a lump sum payment. Just make sure you’re up to the responsibilities. For starters, you’d want to roll over the money directly into an IRA. That way, you’d continue to defer taxes—and avoid a monster tax bill. You’d also have to manage the money, plus follow a disciplined withdrawal strategy…
Read more »

Giving Thanks

AS WE CELEBRATE Thanksgiving, I’m reflecting on what I’ve learned over the past year or so from HumbleDollar—both as a reader and as one of the site’s writers. An article I wrote about claiming Social Security bounced back and forth a few times between me and HumbleDollar’s editor, Jonathan Clements. The breakthrough came when Jonathan referred me to a free online calculator built by financial blogger Mike Piper. I’d been trying to do my own calculation in Excel. Working through the calculator greatly reduced my anxiety about picking the right date to pull the Social Security trigger. I realized that a wide range of dates were pretty much equally good. Meanwhile, an article by Charley Ellis helped me rethink my asset allocation. The key insight: Predictable income such as a pension and Social Security can be considered part of your bond allocation. This gave me the comfort to increase my allocation to stocks. Luckily, this past year has been an good time to add to my stock holdings, thanks to the market decline. Other pieces on the site prompted me to rethink how I invest my cash. John Lim’s article was the first place I read about the handsome yield available from Series I savings bonds. His article led me to open a TreasuryDirect account, so I could purchase I bonds. That account came in handy when a reader, in response to one of my articles, suggested I consider Treasury bills as an attractive alternative for my cash investments. Not every insight is life-changing. Finding ways to tweak my personal finances can be just as satisfying. Jonathan had an article on check washing that opened my eyes. I’ve had my own frustrations with the post office, but I didn’t fully appreciate the risk of sending checks through the mail. Based on…
Read more »

Paying Myself

WHEN I RETIRED 10 years ago, I need to replace my biweekly paycheck. Because I was retiring early, and there would be no pension or Social Security for many years, my goal was to use savings to create a synthetic paycheck. During my final few years of work, I prepared by channeling most of my paycheck into both taxable and tax-deferred accounts. My pay was much higher than what I needed for living expenses. As I’d religiously tracked my spending in Quicken, I could run reports of my historical outlays. I added what would become my single largest expense in the first decade of retirement—purchasing health insurance. I also reduced my budget for those costs I figured would go away in retirement, such as dry cleaning. I built an Excel spreadsheet showing my total expected annual expenses. Next, I divided the annual total by 26 to see my biweekly spending needs. I wanted to track how closely my actual expenses matched my estimate. Though interest rates are nowhere near as high as when I began investing in the late 1970s, I tried to earn as much interest as possible on my savings until I spent the money. Our taxable investment account was a money market fund at Fidelity Investments. I also opened a high-yield savings account with Synchrony, the online bank. Between the two, I kept enough cash for two years of expenses, plus an emergency fund. [xyz-ihs snippet="Mobile-Subscribe"] Over the next 10 years, I moved money between Fidelity and Synchrony to catch the higher rate. For instance, during the pandemic, Fidelity’s money market rates dropped to 0.01%, while Synchrony’s high-yield savings rates stood at 0.5%. Neither was very satisfying, but I moved cash to Synchrony to earn the higher rate. I’d also purchased certificates of deposit at each company,…
Read more »

Copycat Crime

I WAS SITTING AT MY computer one lunchtime when an email popped up from one of my credit card companies, saying I’d just purchased nearly $12,000 of jewelry at a store in Toronto. Within minutes, I was on the phone to the card company. I was quickly referred to the fraud unit. I told my story. The company credited my account, cancelled the card and mailed me replacements. Weeks later, I had to complete a form, signing off on my statement describing what happened. Months later, the company sent me a letter formally closing the case and saying I had no liability. What I learned was that someone had called the card company, pretending to be me, and requested a duplicate card while I was supposedly traveling in Canada. Apparently, the caller supplied enough identifying information that a card was priority shipped to Canada. This had occurred several months before the Toronto transaction. The card was presented in person at the jewelry store. I had set up a series of account alerts online, which is why I knew instantly when the fraud occurred. I suspect I was reporting the crime minutes after the fraudster had left the jewelry store. What baffled me was that there was no alert setting for receiving a duplicate card, let alone receiving a duplicate card in a foreign country. This fraud could have been easily prevented if the card company had emailed me, saying it had issued a duplicate card and shipped it to Canada. Nonetheless, fraud alerts on your banking and credit card accounts can be valuable. After the jewelry incident, I reviewed my settings and tightened them further. Different banks may have slightly different alerts. But generally, they can be categorized as security alerts, transaction alerts and payment alerts. Some are there to…
Read more »

Walking Away

IN PROFESSIONAL sports, superlatives are often overdone. Even the GOAT designation—greatest of all time—is sometimes applied prematurely. But love him or hate him, Tom Brady is arguably the GOAT among NFL quarterbacks and perhaps among all NFL players. For proof, look no further than his collection of record-breaking statistics, Super Bowl rings and most valuable player awards. Could it be that he has added another GOAT designation with his epic fail at retirement? Brady reversed his retirement announcement from the Tampa Bay Buccaneers after just 40 days. What did he figure out in those 40 days that changed his plans? The Bureau of Labor Statistics says the median NFL player career is six years. Brady has played for 22. Didn’t he know that retirement was coming? Maybe it’s a matter of finances. Despite earning in a few years what most people earn in a lifetime, an unfortunate number of NFL players file bankruptcy after their football days are over. Tom and his wife Gisele reportedly have $26 million worth of homes in various states. Perhaps they neglected to factor the mortgage payments into their retirement plan. Maybe they miscalculated how much early retirees pay for health coverage. Perhaps they forgot to fund 529 plans for the kids’ college. Still, with a reported individual net worth of $250 million, coupled with his wife’s $400 million, I’m guessing Brady doesn’t need the paycheck. In a HumbleDollar article last October, Mike Drak described “failing” retirement because he didn’t recognize in advance what retirement would mean for his identity and sense of purpose. For Brady, maybe we shouldn’t discount the feeling that comes with having millions of fans scream his name at every snap. Brady’s stated reason for reversing his retirement decision was “unfinished business.” The fans take this to mean he wants another…
Read more »