FREE NEWSLETTER

Insurance can be a great defense against financial disaster. What happens when it’s contorted into an investment? It becomes the disaster.

Latest PostsAll Discussions »

When your 401(k) excludes target date funds

"Another thing Jim Dahle says is that companies can get in trouble for having a lousy 401(k)."
- Randy Dobkin
Read more »

Inflation, prices, COLAs, retirement and the last 16 years

"This from a quick search, Thank you for correcting me Sir! =========================================== Yes—Members of Congress are covered by Social Security for their work as members of Congress (they pay Social Security taxes and receive Social Security benefits based on their covered earnings). Their eligibility for Social Security is separate from their pension plan: they also participate in the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) or the Federal Employees’ Retirement System (FERS) for federal retirement, which is not Social Security."
- Donny Hrubes
Read more »

One Piece Of Paper

"Thanks, Rick. What a wonderful idea for an evening together. I can only imagine how fascinating it must have been to hear everyone’s “Coming to America” story. I also like the point you made about families who arrived generations ago. Over time it’s easy to forget the courage, uncertainty, and hope that brought our ancestors here in the first place. Whether those journeys happened two hundred years ago or within our own lifetime, they’re all part of the same American story. Thank you for sharing that experience. It fits beautifully with the theme of the article."
- Andrew Clements
Read more »

Short term and long term Social Security planning

"Hey Adam, What you wrote was exactly the point I was getting at. We have already made multiple financial sacrifices since we began our journey to retirement which depended a lot on what we were promised from Social Security. At this point I do not believe it would be fair to cut our benefits more, no matter our wealth. We were told when we began working what the deal was, then they changed it. It was early enough that we could make changes to our financial plans to accommodate the changes. But a this point we should get what we’re were told we were getting after contributing for decades. Those who were already, or close to retirement age were not subject to benefit cuts from the 1983 law, and neither should we. We have already made financial sacrifices to get us to this point in time. Enough is enough. If there are going to be further cuts in benefits and raises in taxation let younger people who have time to adapt their financial plans be the people to sacrifice to ensure their future beyond, just like we were asked to do in the past."
- DavidHLancaster
Read more »

How Did You Find Paid Work After Retiring from Your Primary Career?

"Thank you all for sharing your experiences and advice. I really appreciate the time you took to respond. One theme that stood out to me was how many opportunities came through relationships and simply staying engaged with the community, rather than through a traditional job search. That's given me a different perspective on what my next chapter might look like. I wish everyone continued health and happiness in retirement."
- Jeffrey Chan
Read more »

Taking a Loss?

"Rob - What you are describing is interesting. Would you describe how your ladder was originally structured in 2017?"
- S Sevcik
Read more »

$400,000 Mistake

BOB MADE A very expensive tax mistake. Doctors told Bob that he only has a year to live… What did Bob do?

He decided to gift a house to his only son before passing away. The house is worth $2,000,000 that he bought back in 1970 for $50,000 in an expensive suburb of California.

The son decided to sell the house and paid about $430,000 in federal taxes.

$430,000 that could have been $0 instead…

How?

When you gift a property to someone, they receive a "carryover basis." It basically means the same price the original owner purchased it for.

The basis of that house was $50,000, so the son had to pay capital gains tax on the difference between the $2 million sale price and the basis, at rates reaching up to 23.8% on the top portion of the gain. But this is where a step-up in basis could come into play.

Assets such as a house or shares held in a brokerage account, when owned inside an estate rather than an irrevocable trust, receive a step-up in basis to their fair market value (FMV) at the time of the decedent's death, per IRC Section 1014. In our case, if Bob held that house in his own name, passed away, and his son received the house, he would've gotten a step-up in basis to the current value, or $2M.

At the time of the sale, if sold for $2M, he would pay $0 in federal taxes, though state tax might still apply. That's about $430,000 of "savings."

"But who cares, Bob is dead anyways?"

While true, many parents still want to make sure their children don't have to pay half a million in taxes. They want their children to enjoy the fruits of their hard labor.

Specifics

The step-up in basis can be a bit nuanced, depending on how the assets are held and titled.

First, the step-up in basis typically adjusts to the market value, unless an election is made to use the value six months after the date of death, subject to certain rules.

The step-up in basis also doesn't apply to assets held in an irrevocable trust , though we will cover some strategies for that later, or to assets held in qualified retirement accounts, such as IRAs and 401(k)s.

In a community property state (Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin), the basis steps up whenever a spouse dies. You will typically need to complete a form to receive this step-up in a brokerage account. 

For assets held in joint tenancy, the step-up applies only to the deceased partner's share. For example, Bob and Jenice have a house worth $300,000 with a $50,000 basis. After Bob passes away, Jenice will have a $175,000 basis in the house, calculated as ($300,000 minus $50,000) divided by two, plus $50,000.

There are also two additional things to keep in mind:

1. Living on the right assets

Bob, age 75, has two accounts: a traditional 401(k) worth $500,000 and a brokerage account worth $500,000. Bob's diagnosis isn't good.

From a tax-planning perspective, it might make a lot more sense to withdraw, say, $50,000 a year from the 401(k) to live on, $20,000 of which would be required minimum distributions (RMDs), and pass down the brokerage account to his beneficiaries.

This is because the brokerage account likely has a lot of gains. Bob bought many stocks in his 30s and 40s that could be stepped up now. But a more in-depth analysis might be needed if Bob has a lot of income and is in a high marginal tax bracket.

2. Selling the right lots

Say Bob has a $500,000 brokerage account. Some of the stock purchases have a low basis, meaning a lot of capital gains, and some have a high basis, meaning fewer capital gains.

It's best to sell the high-basis stocks, which come with a lower capital gains tax, and pass down the low-basis stocks to the beneficiaries.

Planning matters. These mistakes can cost thousands of dollars in unnecessary taxes. As always, make sure to consult a licensed CPA or estate attorney with your unique circumstances.

 

Bogdan Sheremeta is a licensed CPA based in Illinois with experience at Deloitte and a Fortune 200 multinational.  
Read more »

Yet-Another Social Security Spreadsheet Analysis on what Age to Start taking Benefits

"Thats a good point. We don't need it ourselves, but I am aware of others for whom it could be useful. As a retired physician, and unfortunately now as a consumer of healthcare myself, I second your opinion about Medicare and supplemental policy."
- Jack Hannam
Read more »

Beware the CFP Designation?

"A CFA would be top-notch, but they generally don't work with individual clients."
- Ormode
Read more »

Social Security

AT FIRST GLANCE, Social Security appears straightforward. During our working years, we pay into it, and in retirement, it sends us a monthly check, guaranteed for life. Unfortunately, it isn’t always so simple. Below are five aspects of the system that are frequently misunderstood. Benefits estimates. Look at a Social Security statement, and an easy-to-read chart provides estimates of the benefits available at various ages. The heading above the chart reads, “Personalized Monthly Retirement Benefit Estimates Depending on the Age You Start.” That seems clear. But there’s a caveat that can make the chart misleading. Off to the side, there’s a further explanation that reads: “These personalized estimates are based on your earnings to date and assume you continue to earn [your most recently reported salary] per year until you start your benefits.” The numbers shown, in other words, are not guaranteed.  Why would the statements be presented this way? It’s because the Social Security Administration can’t predict when any given person will stop working, so for simplicity of presentation, it assumes that someone will continue working and continue earning the same income each year into the future and will then retire and immediately claim benefits. For most people, this isn’t how it works out, but Social Security has no way to know what each person will choose. That’s why benefits statements shouldn’t be taken at face value. How can you forecast your actual benefit? Fortunately, Social Security’s website provides a calculator that allows custom calculations based on actual retirement expectations. Continuing to work. Some people worry that there would be a negative impact if they chose to continue working after claiming Social Security. This concern isn’t totally unfounded. It’s known as the Social Security earnings test, but there are some details to be aware of. First, the earnings test doesn’t apply after a worker reaches Full Retirement Age. And second, to the extent that benefits are reduced in the years before FRA, Social Security will add back those amounts to future checks. So working while on Social Security shouldn’t be viewed as so problematic. Maximum benefit. All things being equal, Social Security retirement benefits increase with each year that you wait, up until age 70. This is broadly understood. The problem, though, is that oftentimes people view it almost as a rule to wait until 70, but that isn’t always the best choice. For married couples, especially where one spouse has accumulated a larger benefit, there are two reasons why one spouse might claim earlier than 70. The first relates to what’s known as the spousal benefit. This is a feature that originated in the days when more families had just one working spouse, and it provides a benefit to spouses who haven’t worked the requisite 10 years to earn a benefit. In general, the spousal benefit is equal to half of the higher-earning spouse’s benefit at their Full Retirement Age (FRA), which is now age 67 for most people. The only requirement is that the lower-earning spouse can’t start benefits until the higher-earning spouse has started his or her own benefit. The spousal benefit is terrific, but a commonly misunderstood limitation is that—unlike a worker’s own benefit—it doesn’t continue to increase each year until age 70. It hits a maximum at the spouse’s FRA. For that reason, it’s important for a spouse to not delay beyond that point.  Even when both spouses have accrued their own benefits, it often makes sense for the spouse with the smaller benefit to claim somewhat earlier than 70. To understand why, we need to look at it from the perspective of the higher earning spouse’s benefit. Because that benefit would also be available to the lower-earning spouse in the form of a survivor’s benefit (discussed further below), that larger benefit will be available to either spouse as long as either is living. The smaller benefit, on the other hand, has value only while both spouses are living. And while it’s unfortunate to say, that is statistically less likely. For that reason, I generally recommend that the lower-earning spouse claim at, or around, Full Retirement Age. When to claim. In most conversations about Social Security, people tend to talk about claiming decisions in round numbers—claiming at 67 or 68, for example. The reality, though, is that you can claim at any time between ages 62 and 70. You don’t need to wait for your birthday, and the benefit simply increases by a bit for each month that you wait. I find this helpful because it allows flexibility in how we think about claiming. Not sure whether to start at 67 or 68? You can easily split the difference. Survivor benefits. To understand how the survivor benefit works, imagine a married couple, Joe and Jane. Joe’s benefit is $5,000 per month, and Jane’s is $4,000. Now suppose that Joe passes away. At that point, Jane wouldn’t be able to claim the combined total of $9,000. However, she could claim a survivor’s benefit that would increase her monthly check from $4,000 to $5,000, matching what Joe was receiving. That’s the simplest case, but the survivor benefit decision is often more complicated because it also depends on the age of the survivor. Survivor benefits can be claimed as early as age 60, and that can be helpful in certain situations, but there’s also a penalty for claiming too early. Benefits can be reduced by nearly 30%. In other words, and importantly, Jane wouldn’t automatically be entitled to $5,000 just because that was what Joe was receiving. When would Jane be able to claim the full $5,000? For this determination, Social Security uses a yardstick known as the Full Retirement Age for Survivors. This isn’t exactly the same as the standard FRA, but it’s close. (Social Security provides a calculator to look it up.) What might this look like in practice? Suppose Jane were a year shy of the FRA for survivors at the time that Joe died. In this case, Jane would have a choice. She could claim her survivor’s benefit at that time, but her total check would come out to somewhat less than $5,000. Fortunately, Social Security doesn’t automatically turn on survivor benefits when a spouse dies, thus providing survivors more control. In Jane’s case, she might continue with her own benefit of $4,000 per month for one more year. Then, once she became eligible for 100% of the survivor’s benefit, she could claim the full $1,000 to reach $5,000.   Adam M. Grossman is the founder of Mayport, a fixed-fee wealth management firm. Sign up for Adam's Daily Ideas email, follow him on X @AdamMGrossman and check out his earlier articles.
Read more »

Before Someone Else Decides

"Thanks for the suggestions! They’re exactly the kinds of things I love to do. Seems like my efforts yesterday put me on the path to some good outcomes. i meant this as a reply to David below, but learning about some different care options is also good."
- Marilyn Lavin
Read more »

Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) are a Generational Bargain Right Now

"Howard, very good explanation about TIPs and the current “positive for investors “ auction. I did some research on Tipswatch.com (as suggested here by others) and found this very good article by David Enna explaining the benefits/ risks and workings of the current TIPS auction. I sent this to my FA who I have a call with this week to discuss if it might be appropriate for our portfolio. thanks again. https://tipswatch.com/2026/07/23/10-year-tips-auction-gets-real-yield-of-2-438-a-great-result-for-investors/"
- luvtoride44afe9eb1e
Read more »

When your 401(k) excludes target date funds

"Another thing Jim Dahle says is that companies can get in trouble for having a lousy 401(k)."
- Randy Dobkin
Read more »

Inflation, prices, COLAs, retirement and the last 16 years

"This from a quick search, Thank you for correcting me Sir! =========================================== Yes—Members of Congress are covered by Social Security for their work as members of Congress (they pay Social Security taxes and receive Social Security benefits based on their covered earnings). Their eligibility for Social Security is separate from their pension plan: they also participate in the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) or the Federal Employees’ Retirement System (FERS) for federal retirement, which is not Social Security."
- Donny Hrubes
Read more »

One Piece Of Paper

"Thanks, Rick. What a wonderful idea for an evening together. I can only imagine how fascinating it must have been to hear everyone’s “Coming to America” story. I also like the point you made about families who arrived generations ago. Over time it’s easy to forget the courage, uncertainty, and hope that brought our ancestors here in the first place. Whether those journeys happened two hundred years ago or within our own lifetime, they’re all part of the same American story. Thank you for sharing that experience. It fits beautifully with the theme of the article."
- Andrew Clements
Read more »

Short term and long term Social Security planning

"Hey Adam, What you wrote was exactly the point I was getting at. We have already made multiple financial sacrifices since we began our journey to retirement which depended a lot on what we were promised from Social Security. At this point I do not believe it would be fair to cut our benefits more, no matter our wealth. We were told when we began working what the deal was, then they changed it. It was early enough that we could make changes to our financial plans to accommodate the changes. But a this point we should get what we’re were told we were getting after contributing for decades. Those who were already, or close to retirement age were not subject to benefit cuts from the 1983 law, and neither should we. We have already made financial sacrifices to get us to this point in time. Enough is enough. If there are going to be further cuts in benefits and raises in taxation let younger people who have time to adapt their financial plans be the people to sacrifice to ensure their future beyond, just like we were asked to do in the past."
- DavidHLancaster
Read more »

How Did You Find Paid Work After Retiring from Your Primary Career?

"Thank you all for sharing your experiences and advice. I really appreciate the time you took to respond. One theme that stood out to me was how many opportunities came through relationships and simply staying engaged with the community, rather than through a traditional job search. That's given me a different perspective on what my next chapter might look like. I wish everyone continued health and happiness in retirement."
- Jeffrey Chan
Read more »

Taking a Loss?

"Rob - What you are describing is interesting. Would you describe how your ladder was originally structured in 2017?"
- S Sevcik
Read more »

$400,000 Mistake

BOB MADE A very expensive tax mistake. Doctors told Bob that he only has a year to live… What did Bob do?

He decided to gift a house to his only son before passing away. The house is worth $2,000,000 that he bought back in 1970 for $50,000 in an expensive suburb of California.

The son decided to sell the house and paid about $430,000 in federal taxes.

$430,000 that could have been $0 instead…

How?

When you gift a property to someone, they receive a "carryover basis." It basically means the same price the original owner purchased it for.

The basis of that house was $50,000, so the son had to pay capital gains tax on the difference between the $2 million sale price and the basis, at rates reaching up to 23.8% on the top portion of the gain. But this is where a step-up in basis could come into play.

Assets such as a house or shares held in a brokerage account, when owned inside an estate rather than an irrevocable trust, receive a step-up in basis to their fair market value (FMV) at the time of the decedent's death, per IRC Section 1014. In our case, if Bob held that house in his own name, passed away, and his son received the house, he would've gotten a step-up in basis to the current value, or $2M.

At the time of the sale, if sold for $2M, he would pay $0 in federal taxes, though state tax might still apply. That's about $430,000 of "savings."

"But who cares, Bob is dead anyways?"

While true, many parents still want to make sure their children don't have to pay half a million in taxes. They want their children to enjoy the fruits of their hard labor.

Specifics

The step-up in basis can be a bit nuanced, depending on how the assets are held and titled.

First, the step-up in basis typically adjusts to the market value, unless an election is made to use the value six months after the date of death, subject to certain rules.

The step-up in basis also doesn't apply to assets held in an irrevocable trust , though we will cover some strategies for that later, or to assets held in qualified retirement accounts, such as IRAs and 401(k)s.

In a community property state (Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin), the basis steps up whenever a spouse dies. You will typically need to complete a form to receive this step-up in a brokerage account. 

For assets held in joint tenancy, the step-up applies only to the deceased partner's share. For example, Bob and Jenice have a house worth $300,000 with a $50,000 basis. After Bob passes away, Jenice will have a $175,000 basis in the house, calculated as ($300,000 minus $50,000) divided by two, plus $50,000.

There are also two additional things to keep in mind:

1. Living on the right assets

Bob, age 75, has two accounts: a traditional 401(k) worth $500,000 and a brokerage account worth $500,000. Bob's diagnosis isn't good.

From a tax-planning perspective, it might make a lot more sense to withdraw, say, $50,000 a year from the 401(k) to live on, $20,000 of which would be required minimum distributions (RMDs), and pass down the brokerage account to his beneficiaries.

This is because the brokerage account likely has a lot of gains. Bob bought many stocks in his 30s and 40s that could be stepped up now. But a more in-depth analysis might be needed if Bob has a lot of income and is in a high marginal tax bracket.

2. Selling the right lots

Say Bob has a $500,000 brokerage account. Some of the stock purchases have a low basis, meaning a lot of capital gains, and some have a high basis, meaning fewer capital gains.

It's best to sell the high-basis stocks, which come with a lower capital gains tax, and pass down the low-basis stocks to the beneficiaries.

Planning matters. These mistakes can cost thousands of dollars in unnecessary taxes. As always, make sure to consult a licensed CPA or estate attorney with your unique circumstances.

 

Bogdan Sheremeta is a licensed CPA based in Illinois with experience at Deloitte and a Fortune 200 multinational.  
Read more »

Yet-Another Social Security Spreadsheet Analysis on what Age to Start taking Benefits

"Thats a good point. We don't need it ourselves, but I am aware of others for whom it could be useful. As a retired physician, and unfortunately now as a consumer of healthcare myself, I second your opinion about Medicare and supplemental policy."
- Jack Hannam
Read more »

Beware the CFP Designation?

"A CFA would be top-notch, but they generally don't work with individual clients."
- Ormode
Read more »

Free Newsletter

Get Educated

Manifesto

NO. 41: VERY FEW of us need life insurance for our entire life. That’s why term insurance makes sense and cash-value policies are usually a mistake—despite what insurance agents say.

act

CHECK YOUR Social Security statement to get an estimate of benefits and make sure your earnings record is correct. The easiest way to do this: Set up a “my Social Security” account, preferably adding two-factor authentication. This will also preempt scammers, who might otherwise try to set up an account in your name—and claim your benefits.

Truths

NO. 49: YOU CAN have stability of principal and stability of income but, in a liquid investment, you can't have both. Money-market funds and savings accounts offer stability of principal, but the rate paid can quickly rise and fall. Most bonds, by contrast, pay the same amount of interest each year until maturity, but they can fluctuate sharply in price.

think

ANCHORING. Imagine the S&P 500 is up 20% over the past year. You might balk at buying stocks, because you’re anchored on the market’s old level and feel you’re overpaying at current prices. Or imagine your neighbors sold their home two years ago for $300,000. You might be reluctant to accept less for your home, even if property prices have since fallen.

Homes

Manifesto

NO. 41: VERY FEW of us need life insurance for our entire life. That’s why term insurance makes sense and cash-value policies are usually a mistake—despite what insurance agents say.

Spotlight: Taxes

Capital Gains Planning

THE IRS RECENTLY announced inflation adjustments for the tax year 2026.
2 quick changes:

Standard deduction

For single taxpayers, the standard deduction rises to $16,100 for 2026, an increase of $350 from 2025.
For married couples filing jointly, the standard deduction rises to $32,200, an increase of $700 from tax year 2025.

Capital Gains Rates

For single taxpayers, long-term capital gains are taxed at 0% if the taxable income is up to $49,450 ($98,900 for married couples filing jointly).

Read more »

Kitces – Analyzing Congressional Republicans’ Budget Proposal For The 2025 TCJA Extension

On April 30, Kitces posted an comprehensive article regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) describing in detail where the congress is currently at and what steps are necessary to extend and/or change the the TCJA before the current tax law sunsets at the end of 2025.
https://www.kitces.com/blog/tax-cuts-and-jobs-act-tcja-sunset-budget-resolution-reconciliation-salt-cap-qbi-deduction-congress-republication-house-senate-bill/
I agree with the conclusion of the article to currently “wait and see” before taking action until I have a concrete expectation of what the individual income tax rules will look like in 2026.

Read more »

Widow Tax

THE WIDOW TAX is sold to the wrong households. It gets pitched to affluent couples as the reason to convert to a Roth or buy life insurance. The pitch says that when one spouse dies, the survivor files single, lands in a higher bracket, and gets clobbered. I ran the numbers for three couples at three incomes, and at the comfortable end the widow tax often costs nothing, or even less than nothing.
The real cost lands lower down,

Read more »

Talking Trillions

Focus on the causes, not the symptoms.
There’s been a heap of handwringing this year over both federal government borrowing and possible cuts in Social Security benefits, and the current budget bill before Congress is only exacerbating those fears. But I worry folks are focusing on the wrong things.
As Adam Grossman noted recently, the federal government collects $5 trillion in revenue each year and spends $7 trillion. Why? You might point the finger at Medicare,

Read more »

New Bonus Senior Deduction Impact

The recently enacted One Big Beautiful Bill Act included a number of tax provisions of interest to HumbleDollar readers. Given the emphasis on retirement planning on HumbleDollar, the new bonus Deduction for Seniors has potential to provide a significant tax savings for seniors.
This has been discussed in previous posts over the last few weeks, but the details are worth a quick review.  Taxpayers who reach 65 by the last day of the tax year, starting in 2025,

Read more »

Managing Transitions: Best Practices for When a Practitioner Passes Away

On Friday, May 15,  I received the attached email Alert from the IRS Office of Professional Responsibility. The email topic, When a Practitioner Passes Away, is mostly focused directly at anyone subject to Circular 230 that practices before the IRS, typically attorneys, certified public accountants, enrolled agents and others who prepare tax returns for pay. I think it likely that every state also has their own additional laws and regulations regarding protection of your data.

Read more »

Spotlight: Mcintosh

Buckeye Burglar

“DEAR OHIOAN: According to our records, you have applied for and/or received pandemic unemployment benefits.” As I haven’t been to Ohio in more than 20 years, I knew something was amiss. It was highly likely I was the victim of identify fraud. After some investigation, I found out someone had been receiving unemployment benefits in my name since March 2021. I’m hardly the only person victimized by this fraud. In a recent report, Ohio Auditor Keith Faber estimated that $3.8 billion in fraudulent unemployment payments and overpayments had been made since March 2020. The fraud has been so widespread that claims have been made in the names Ohio’s governor and lieutenant governor. To prevent further fraud, I reported the matter to the state of Ohio. Initially, I was skittish about filing the fraud report online because I had to provide my Social Security number, but I figured the online system was the safest way to report the fraud—and certainly better than giving my personal information over the phone, which had backfired on me before. Next, I reviewed my credit report to ensure that no one had parlayed my personal information into an even bigger fraud. Fortunately, there was no unusual credit activity. But because someone obviously had my personal information, I decided I’d better monitor my credit activity more closely. I chatted with a colleague about available services, and ended up selecting the Complete ID service offered by Costco. Costco partners with Experian to provide members with credit monitoring, identity protection and restoration services, which now costs me $8.99 a month. I also pay another $2.99 a month to have my two children’s information monitored.
Read more »

The Next $1,000

AS I MENTIONED in an article back in June, my wife and I funded a custodial account for our son three years ago. He used the $1,000 we gave him to buy shares of Nike and Exxon. We figured what’s good for our oldest child would also be good for No. 2. Our daughter recently completed fifth grade and is now age 11. Earlier this summer, we set up an account for her and added $1,000. While she hasn’t shown as much interest in investing as our son, there were three solid learnings from opening her account and making her initial investments: She took the responsibility of picking stocks very seriously when she understood that “real money” was in her account and not just points that had accumulated in an app. After some basic financial analysis coupled with consideration of her personal interests, she selected Nintendo and Gap as her two stocks to purchase. As with my son, she had to decide whether she’d reinvest dividends. While my son picked up on the power of compounding as part of the reinvestment decision, my daughter was more focused on the “real money” that companies would pay in dividends. I explained that if companies are profitable, they can elect to pay a portion of profits to shareholders. She liked the notion that she’d likely get cash each quarter from both companies. Finally, upon purchase of Nintendo’s stock, we discussed that "ADR" was appended to the end of the company’s ticker symbol. I was able to share that while Nintendo is a Japanese company, we can buy an ADR—or American depositary receipt—for Nintendo that’s traded on a U.S. stock exchange. While this concept was over her head, it at least introduced the notion, and no doubt we’ll talk about it again.
Read more »

Marked Absent

THE NATIONAL STUDENT Clearinghouse Research Center recently published a report on postsecondary enrollment for fall 2021, including enrollment at community colleges, undergraduate institutions and graduate schools. If you’re a believer in postsecondary education, the headline numbers weren’t encouraging. Enrollment fell by 2.7%, or 476,100 students. Over the two years since the start of the pandemic, it’s declined by 5.1%, or 937,500 students. While the report offers no reasons for these declines, my view is that colleges are struggling to justify their value proposition to students and their families, especially during a pandemic that’s disrupted in-person learning. As I’ve noted before, college costs are extremely high, creating a significant financial burden for just about any family. Why should a family take on six figures of debt when a student can earn a good wage at age 18? A manufacturing company near me is offering entry-level workers more than $20 an hour, plus training and benefits. Only a high school degree—or its equivalent—is required. With opportunities like that available, it can be hard to justify the cost of college. This may be the reason behind the big drop in liberal arts majors. The number of liberal arts majors at four-year institutions fell by 78,774 students, or 7.6%, in fall 2021. By contrast, those majoring in computer and information sciences increased 1.3%, and that followed gains of 5.6% and 4.5% in the prior two years. It appears some students have decided they need to graduate with solid technical skills to justify their tuition bill. Over the next several years, I believe we’ll continue to see students shift to majors that should lead them to lucrative careers. I also suspect many universities—especially private ones—will revise their pricing and course offerings to make themselves more compelling to students.
Read more »

Numbers Game

IT HAPPENED AGAIN. For the third time in two years, our credit card number was stolen. I learned this yesterday when I received the now-too-frequent question from Chase: “Do you recognize this gas station purchase for $1?” We live nowhere near the station in question, so I knew something was amiss. I appreciate Chase’s diligence in identifying such transactions, and the fact that we won’t be held liable for any fraudulent charges. Still, I’ve grown weary of the whole process of cancelling credit cards, especially resetting the automatic payments tied to each. On top of that, it’s unsettling to know someone is trying to buy things using one of our cards. The most frustrating thing about this latest theft: My wife and I had changed certain practices over the past year in an effort to limit the risk of fraud. For a previous card number theft, we observed a close link between the fraud and a “new account setup” with a vendor that required us to provide our card number over the phone. We now refuse to do so. We’ve found that, for vendors requesting numbers over the phone, they usually also accept payments via Venmo or PayPal. In addition, many also have websites that allow you to make payments online. The site still asks for your number, but this seems to be more secure. Another practice we started: We use cash for transactions where there’s a higher risk of fraud. For instance, we usually pay cash at gas stations, where skimming devices are sometimes used to steal card information. Another practice we follow: Pay cash at restaurants where the server takes your card and swipes it in another location. In such situations, it’s all too easy for a server to take a picture of the front and back of…
Read more »

What’s the Price?

DRIVE TO HOSPITAL. Cut the umbilical cord. Figure out names. Open a 529. While the primary focus upon our two babies’ births was bonding, I had another item to check off: I opened a 529 college savings account for each one within a month of their births. It’s paid off handsomely. Through automatic monthly contributions—plus stellar market performance over the past decade—they’ve amassed sizable balances for higher education. One child now is in high school, the other is a middle-schooler. Based on what we’ve already accumulated, I’m considering pausing future contributions to their 529s. Why? At this point, I see two likely scenarios: We’ll either overfund our 529s—or we’ll wind up with a serious shortfall. I know that sounds confusing, but it all depends on which colleges they attend. To decide whether to continue contributing, I’ve been researching what their colleges might cost. And the answers I’ve found are confounding. Unlike most other areas of financial planning, college presents parents like us with a staggering range of possible costs. For example, the average cost for four years of public college is now about $105,000 for in-state students. The comparable cost for a private college is $220,000, according to EducationData.org. These figures include room and board. If either child decides to attend a local community college for the first two years—a viable option in our area—the four-year cost could drop to around $65,000. I consider myself to be well-versed in financial planning and higher education. After all, I’m a college professor. Still, the incredible disparity in average college costs leaves me surprised. Just to make it more difficult, these figures I’m quoting are averages. Many schools’ published prices are much, much higher. The full cost for football rivals Notre Dame and the University of Southern California (USC) in 2021-22 are $58,843 and…
Read more »

Driven to What?

IN THE FIRST WEEK of March, prices for regular unleaded gas sprinted past $5 per gallon in Ventura County, California. Last week, a station I pass on my way to work increased its price three times in 36 hours. Before work on Thursday, March 3, the price was $4.89 per gallon. By the end of that same day, the price was up to $5.09. When I left work on Friday, March 4, the price had been jacked up again, this time to $5.29. As I write this post on Wednesday, March 9, the price has ticked up to $5.69 per gallon. That’s an increase of 80 cents, or 16%, in less than a week. The last time I saw prices over $5 was July 2008. While I don’t remember adjusting my habits when prices hit $4 or $4.50 in 2008, there was something about the $5 threshold that led me and many others to change our daily routine. With 2022 prices looking like they’ll be over $5 per gallon for an extended period, I’m curious to see when and how consumers will change their behavior this time around. Here’s what I’ll be watching for: Wading into the carpool. In 2008, I commuted 50 miles roundtrip. While I lived close to a handful of my coworkers, we all preferred to drive solo most days. But when prices touched $5 per gallon, a group of us started to carpool a few days per week. With continued COVID worries and many people working remotely, carpooling options may be limited in 2022. But if prices continue to rise, I suspect many will start sharing commute time with others. Pricing SUVs. In 2008, demand for gas-guzzling sports utility vehicles dropped dramatically in our area. I had two friends who sold Ford Expeditions around this time. Both…
Read more »