FREE NEWSLETTER

Financial danger sign: Your broker saves you money by only recommending funds with “no initial sales commission.”

Latest PostsAll Discussions »

So Maybe That’s What It’s All About

"I know cows do love music. A few decades ago I was given a tour of a 500-cow dairy farm that had all the modern conveniences, including scales that weighed the milk produced by each cow. Music played throughout the mostly mechanical milking process and the workers had come to know what kind of music seemed correlated with higher production. Classical, as I recall, not country. Don’t know how the cows feel about a choir of retired New Yorkers singing to them, but I hope they listened politely if they didn’t applaud 😊"
- Linda Grady
Read more »

Don’t Let a Roth Conversion Trigger a Penalty

"
dhack11 - You should make a "How To" post. So many people get intimidated by Form 2210. Thanks for reading. – John
"
- John Urban
Read more »

Better Questions

"Spouse started keeping a spreadsheet after retirement. I had never done this, I did more of a guardrail type budget and sinking funds. So I have no idea if the spreadsheet is good or not? I certainly have no idea what the information tells us. I am going to suggest to spouse to play with AI and the spreadsheet to see if it can tell us anything useful. Thanks for the suggestion, Mark. Chris"
- baldscreen
Read more »

About that inflation in retirement

"I have a local govt pension. It must get profits from investments to pay a COLA. Due to mismangement, our pension has only awarded one 1% COLA in fifteen years. I know the impact no COLAs have, so I am not a fan of further COLA reductions from the SS."
- Jerry Pinkard
Read more »

A taxing situation, but is it reality?

"I would have to agree that in my experience with Medicare some years ago on my parent's behalf, I found it surprisingly easy to deal with. On a more limited basis same with Social Security for them. That does not automatically make them efficient by default however in order to provide that level of service. All that said, your article is not about Social Security or Medicare, it is about taxes and only one (federal) portion of the broader tax load picture at that. When you focus an article on taxes, all aspects of government efficiency with the public's funds are fair game when contemplating more taxes. S.S. and Medicare are but two pixels in a much broader picture of morbid mediocrity. Reference corporations: you highlight two positives: 1) the ability to right size private sector organizations to changing business conditions or enhanced technology or LEAN based efficiencies (or maybe correct inefficiency that set in through poor management and needs to be cleaned up) ....without having to go to the Supreme Court to do it. 2) For businesses that fail due to inefficiency or not evolving fast enough, natural selection culls the herd- healthy for the overall economy. Not so with government agencies.....unfortunately- unhealthy for the overall economy."
- Dunn Werking
Read more »

Haunted Head

"Martin, that about sums it up for me as well. I do find preparing taxes for AARP to be deserving of my time. Chrissy volunteers at a cat rescue, which helps in getting cats spayed or neutered, and off the streets. I’m sure I could find other worthy assignments, but I’m pretty happy with my level of involvement. "
- Dan Smith
Read more »

Trump Accounts

INNOVATION IN THE world of retirement plans is decidedly slow moving. But as of July 4th, investors now have a new savings option known as a Trump account. In short, these are retirement accounts designed specifically for children. Trump accounts share some similarities with traditional individual retirement accounts (IRAs), but there are also key differences. If you have children, grandchildren, nieces or nephews, this new option may be worth exploring. Who is eligible for a Trump account? An account can be opened for any child who will be under 18 as of December 31 in the year that the account is opened. How are Trump accounts different from traditional IRAs? The primary goal of these accounts is to allow children to begin to accumulate retirement funds much earlier than has been possible in the past. For that reason, and in contrast to traditional IRAs, Trump accounts don’t require a child to have any earned income. Contributions could begin as soon as a baby is born.  What is the process for opening an account? To get started, head to the new government website at trumpaccounts.gov. From there, you can download a mobile app to start the account opening process. I tried it myself, opening an account for one of my sons, and found the process quite easy. One nice feature is that the funds are invested automatically in low-cost index funds. What are the contribution limits? Trump accounts have their own unique contribution caps, which are a little complicated. Individuals and employers can contribute up to a total of $5,000 per child per year, though the employer portion is limited to $2,500 of that $5,000. This limit will grow in future years. In addition, the government and a group of philanthropists have established a pilot program and are making contributions to certain new Trump accounts. Children born between January 1, 2025 and December 31, 2028 are eligible to receive a $1,000 contribution from the government upon opening a new account. In addition to this $1,000 contribution from the government, a group of philanthropists, including Michael Dell, Ray Dalio and others, are contributing $250 to Trump accounts for children up to 10 years old who live in particular Zip codes. These additional contributions don’t count toward the $5,000 annual contribution limit. Do Trump account contributions affect IRA contribution limits? If your child has earned income, he or she can contribute the maximum to a Trump account and still also contribute to a regular IRA or Roth IRA up to the annual IRA contribution limit. There’s no tradeoff. How are withdrawals treated? Withdrawals from Trump accounts aren’t permitted during the initial “growth period,” which begins at birth and ends on December 31 of the year before the child turns 18.  After the growth period, withdrawals from Trump accounts will be treated in much the same way as traditional IRAs. Specifically, withdrawals prior to age 59½ are subject to a 10% tax penalty. Trump accounts do, however, allow for penalty-free withdrawals before 59½ under certain circumstances, including a first-time home purchase, higher education and a few other, less common situations. The tax treatment of withdrawals differs by donor: Contributions by individuals are made on an after-tax basis, so those dollars come out tax-free. Investment gains on those contributions, however, are subject to ordinary income tax. Any dollars received from the government or other donors under the pilot program will also be subject to ordinary income tax. Should you contribute to a Trump account? The answer, as with most financial questions, is that it depends. Here’s a framework you might consider: Step 1: If your child was born between 2025 and 2028 and is thus eligible for the government contribution of $1,000, that is the easiest decision. I would head over to the new website today to get started. Step 2: Should you make contributions beyond the government’s initial $1,000? I would pause at this point to assess where your college savings stand. Since education is such a significant expense and since 529 accounts have the benefit of growing tax-free, I would prioritize college savings over a Trump account contribution. Step 3: The next account to consider is a custodial Roth IRA. If your children have any income, they can contribute to a Roth IRA. And since Roth balances grow tax-free too, I would also prioritize Roth contributions over Trump account contributions, where the growth will be taxable. Step 4: After addressing potential 529 and Roth IRA contributions, ordinarily the next savings option to consider would be a custodial taxable account—often referred to as an UTMA. But it’s at this point that you might consider a Trump account.  How should you think about this decision? While there are tax differences between UTMA accounts and Trump accounts, and there are differences in contribution limits, neither of those, in my view, should be the primary consideration. Instead, the question I’d ask is how you’d like the funds to be used, and on that point, there’s a big difference between an UTMA and a Trump account. Depending on the state, children can generally access funds in an UTMA at either age 18 or 21. If you feel your child would benefit from having some funds to help get established in the early years after college, then an UTMA might be the better choice. In contrast, Trump accounts are really designed to be retirement accounts, with only the handful of early withdrawal provisions referenced earlier. If you’d prefer to see your child’s savings grow for decades, then the Trump account might be the better choice. If you aren’t sure how to decide between a contribution to an UTMA and a Trump account, you could always split the difference. One reason to do that is because Trump accounts present an interesting tax planning opportunity. After the growth period, if a child has a Trump account balance, that balance would be eligible for a Roth conversion, whereby it would transfer over to a Roth IRA to grow tax-free. Of course, Roth conversions are taxable, but if a child is in a low tax bracket in the early years after college, the tax might be modest. I see that as a compelling reason to consider making at least some contributions to a Trump account.   Adam M. Grossman is the founder of Mayport, a fixed-fee wealth management firm. Sign up for Adam's Daily Ideas email, follow him on X @AdamMGrossman and check out his earlier articles.  
Read more »

Frittering away Frugality 

"I understand the skepticism, but there are reasons Costco works for some. Like any subscription arrangement, you have to balance the cost against savings every year for Costco (as you need to do for Amazon Prime and similar things). I have a small numbers of things I particularly like at Costco, and buy over and over for the savings - like Advil, certain breakfast cereals, Keurig pods and gas for my car. There are a handful of others. I first went there for eyeglasses - great service and much lower prices. Periodically, I buy individual things for better prices, like lawn fertilizer, printer ink, canned olives, dried mango and in the spring, plants. I don't buy much else. The eyeglasses alone saved me much more than the annual fee. Cheaper gas is always about 15-20 cents a gallon better than local stations. My gut calculations tell me I am better off each year, since I don't load up on things unnecessarily. But the Costco advantage is not a giant advantage. One thing I do notice is that Costco is also a destination for many non-profits that serve the poor. I often see people with three and four loaded carts at a time, all with essentials and no impulse item. I think that when those people load up their carts with food essentials, they should be applauded for using their contributions wisely."
- Martin McCue
Read more »

The Making of Jonathan Clements

WHEN READERS THINK of my younger brother Jonathan Clements, they often picture the longtime Wall Street Journal columnist or the founder of HumbleDollar. They remember the clear financial advice, the thoughtful essays and the quiet wisdom that helped millions make better decisions with their money. But every writer has a beginning. As I've been researching Jonathan's life over the past several weeks, I've found myself drawn less to the career everyone knows and more to the people who helped shape it. Before the books, the columns and the countless readers, there was a curious teenager discovering that he loved to write. Jonathan's journey began long before Wall Street, long before Forbes and long before HumbleDollar. It began with a school magazine at Bryanston School in Dorset, England. As a teenager, Jonathan joined the staff of Saga, the school magazine. There he wrote an article criticizing Bryanston's decision to spend money on a new pipe organ while other parts of the school needed attention. Years later, Jonathan looked back on that article with characteristic humor, saying it earned him "the enmity of a host of people." But he also said something far more revealing. That article, he believed, "was my entrée to becoming a journalist." More importantly, Jonathan had discovered not just that he enjoyed writing, but that he enjoyed asking difficult questions. Reading those early Saga articles today, what strikes me isn't simply Jonathan's talent. It's how familiar his voice already sounds. Even as a teenager, he questioned accepted wisdom with humor rather than hostility, weighed competing arguments fairly and cared deeply about priorities. Years later, readers would come to know him for helping them decide what mattered most in their financial lives. Looking back, those instincts were already there. Journalism also ran in the family. Our father began his career as a journalist before becoming an economist, and Jonathan often said his example inspired him to pursue financial journalism. After leaving Bryanston, Jonathan had almost a year before beginning his studies at Cambridge, our father's alma mater. During that time, a family friend, Mrs. Dolezal, helped him secure a reporting job at the Potomac Almanac, a small community newspaper in suburban Washington. For the next eight months, Jonathan did what young reporters often do. One day he covered education. The next, sports. Then police, then business. It wasn't glamorous work, but it taught him the fundamentals of reporting. Years later, Jonathan would describe those eight months as "the most fun and the most educational experience I had in journalism." It wasn't a large newspaper, but it gave a young reporter the opportunity to learn every aspect of the profession. Even more importantly, it introduced him to the paper's editor, Leslie Leven. Decades later, after writing for Forbes, The Wall Street Journal and founding HumbleDollar, Jonathan was asked about the people who had influenced his career. His answer surprised me. Of everyone he had worked with, he singled out Leslie, describing her as "probably the most important mentor I had." Those words say as much about Jonathan as they do about Leslie. No matter how successful he became, Jonathan never forgot the people who had believed in him before anyone else did. Cambridge came next, but by then journalism was no longer simply an interest. Jonathan later admitted that during one term he attended only four lectures because he was so immersed in editing the student newspaper, Varsity. Somewhere along the way, writing had stopped being a hobby and had become the work he wanted to spend his life doing. After Cambridge, Jonathan joined Euromoney in London, his first full-time journalism position. It was another stepping stone that eventually led him to New York and Forbes, where he discovered the world of personal finance writing. The years that followed are well known. After Forbes came nearly two decades at The Wall Street Journal, where Jonathan became one of the country's most respected personal finance columnists. He later spent six years at Citigroup as Director of Financial Education, helping investors better understand their financial lives. But the entrepreneurial spirit never left him. In 2016, he founded HumbleDollar, creating not simply another financial website, but a community built on thoughtful conversation, generosity and the belief that money is ultimately a means to a richer life, not an end in itself. Millions of readers came to trust his judgment and his remarkable ability to explain complicated ideas with clarity, humanity and compassion. Growing up, I don't think any of us could have imagined where Jonathan's curiosity and love of writing would eventually lead. He was simply my younger brother; curious, thoughtful and always eager to learn. Looking back now, the path seems almost inevitable. At the time, it was anything but. But as I've pieced together Jonathan's early years, I've come away with a different appreciation of his career. I always knew where Jonathan finished. Only recently have I begun to appreciate where, and with whom, it all began. Long before Jonathan became a mentor to countless writers and readers, someone had mentored him. A family friend opened a door. An editor patiently taught him his craft. A small community newspaper gave him a chance. We often celebrate the finished product. The successful journalist, the respected author, the trusted voice. Yet behind almost every accomplished life are people whose names are seldom remembered, people who quietly open doors, encourage talent and believe in someone long before the rest of the world notices. Jonathan never forgot them. Perhaps that's why, years later, so many aspiring writers would tell similar stories about him. He answered emails, encouraged new voices, edited with kindness and opened doors for others just as doors had once been opened for him. In the end, Jonathan's story isn't simply about becoming one of the world's most respected financial journalists. It's also about the people who quietly shaped that journey. Mrs. Dolezal opened the first door and Leslie Leven helped Jonathan find his footing as a young reporter. Those early opportunities gave him the confidence to pursue the career that followed. Every accomplished life begins somewhere. Jonathan's began with people who saw potential in a young man long before the rest of the world did.   After spending more than two decades building a successful landscaping business with his twin brother Nicholas, Andrew Clements retired in 2015 with a new appreciation for what matters most. Born in England, his essays draw on a life that has included growing up in England and Bangladesh, entrepreneurship, caregiving, family loss and travel. A regular HumbleDollar contributor, he enjoys tellingstories that remind readers life’s richest lessons often have little to do with money. Andrew is the older brother of HumbleDollar founder Jonathan Clements, whose life and legacy have inspired some of his most personal writing. He lives in Florida with his husband, Joey.
Read more »

Thinking of a possible reason to tap Roth earlier then planned

"One idea that maybe won’t work for you but might work for others is what’s called a box spread— four options trades that together result in effectively a loan against the market at close to treasury rates. I don’t think you can trade options against an IRA though, so you would need assets in a taxable account. You wouldn’t have to sell the assets in the taxable account, but you would need assets in a taxable account."
- cheitzig
Read more »

Happy 250th Birthday America

"Most of us are very thankful immigrants and Proud to be an American. Thanks for the reminder."
- William Dorner
Read more »

Every Writer Has a Beginning: Organ Transplant Fails

"Thanks Andrew for these wonderful tidbits about Jonathan. We treasure your brother, and all his wonderful wisdom."
- William Dorner
Read more »

So Maybe That’s What It’s All About

"I know cows do love music. A few decades ago I was given a tour of a 500-cow dairy farm that had all the modern conveniences, including scales that weighed the milk produced by each cow. Music played throughout the mostly mechanical milking process and the workers had come to know what kind of music seemed correlated with higher production. Classical, as I recall, not country. Don’t know how the cows feel about a choir of retired New Yorkers singing to them, but I hope they listened politely if they didn’t applaud 😊"
- Linda Grady
Read more »

Don’t Let a Roth Conversion Trigger a Penalty

"
dhack11 - You should make a "How To" post. So many people get intimidated by Form 2210. Thanks for reading. – John
"
- John Urban
Read more »

Better Questions

"Spouse started keeping a spreadsheet after retirement. I had never done this, I did more of a guardrail type budget and sinking funds. So I have no idea if the spreadsheet is good or not? I certainly have no idea what the information tells us. I am going to suggest to spouse to play with AI and the spreadsheet to see if it can tell us anything useful. Thanks for the suggestion, Mark. Chris"
- baldscreen
Read more »

About that inflation in retirement

"I have a local govt pension. It must get profits from investments to pay a COLA. Due to mismangement, our pension has only awarded one 1% COLA in fifteen years. I know the impact no COLAs have, so I am not a fan of further COLA reductions from the SS."
- Jerry Pinkard
Read more »

A taxing situation, but is it reality?

"I would have to agree that in my experience with Medicare some years ago on my parent's behalf, I found it surprisingly easy to deal with. On a more limited basis same with Social Security for them. That does not automatically make them efficient by default however in order to provide that level of service. All that said, your article is not about Social Security or Medicare, it is about taxes and only one (federal) portion of the broader tax load picture at that. When you focus an article on taxes, all aspects of government efficiency with the public's funds are fair game when contemplating more taxes. S.S. and Medicare are but two pixels in a much broader picture of morbid mediocrity. Reference corporations: you highlight two positives: 1) the ability to right size private sector organizations to changing business conditions or enhanced technology or LEAN based efficiencies (or maybe correct inefficiency that set in through poor management and needs to be cleaned up) ....without having to go to the Supreme Court to do it. 2) For businesses that fail due to inefficiency or not evolving fast enough, natural selection culls the herd- healthy for the overall economy. Not so with government agencies.....unfortunately- unhealthy for the overall economy."
- Dunn Werking
Read more »

Haunted Head

"Martin, that about sums it up for me as well. I do find preparing taxes for AARP to be deserving of my time. Chrissy volunteers at a cat rescue, which helps in getting cats spayed or neutered, and off the streets. I’m sure I could find other worthy assignments, but I’m pretty happy with my level of involvement. "
- Dan Smith
Read more »

Trump Accounts

INNOVATION IN THE world of retirement plans is decidedly slow moving. But as of July 4th, investors now have a new savings option known as a Trump account. In short, these are retirement accounts designed specifically for children. Trump accounts share some similarities with traditional individual retirement accounts (IRAs), but there are also key differences. If you have children, grandchildren, nieces or nephews, this new option may be worth exploring. Who is eligible for a Trump account? An account can be opened for any child who will be under 18 as of December 31 in the year that the account is opened. How are Trump accounts different from traditional IRAs? The primary goal of these accounts is to allow children to begin to accumulate retirement funds much earlier than has been possible in the past. For that reason, and in contrast to traditional IRAs, Trump accounts don’t require a child to have any earned income. Contributions could begin as soon as a baby is born.  What is the process for opening an account? To get started, head to the new government website at trumpaccounts.gov. From there, you can download a mobile app to start the account opening process. I tried it myself, opening an account for one of my sons, and found the process quite easy. One nice feature is that the funds are invested automatically in low-cost index funds. What are the contribution limits? Trump accounts have their own unique contribution caps, which are a little complicated. Individuals and employers can contribute up to a total of $5,000 per child per year, though the employer portion is limited to $2,500 of that $5,000. This limit will grow in future years. In addition, the government and a group of philanthropists have established a pilot program and are making contributions to certain new Trump accounts. Children born between January 1, 2025 and December 31, 2028 are eligible to receive a $1,000 contribution from the government upon opening a new account. In addition to this $1,000 contribution from the government, a group of philanthropists, including Michael Dell, Ray Dalio and others, are contributing $250 to Trump accounts for children up to 10 years old who live in particular Zip codes. These additional contributions don’t count toward the $5,000 annual contribution limit. Do Trump account contributions affect IRA contribution limits? If your child has earned income, he or she can contribute the maximum to a Trump account and still also contribute to a regular IRA or Roth IRA up to the annual IRA contribution limit. There’s no tradeoff. How are withdrawals treated? Withdrawals from Trump accounts aren’t permitted during the initial “growth period,” which begins at birth and ends on December 31 of the year before the child turns 18.  After the growth period, withdrawals from Trump accounts will be treated in much the same way as traditional IRAs. Specifically, withdrawals prior to age 59½ are subject to a 10% tax penalty. Trump accounts do, however, allow for penalty-free withdrawals before 59½ under certain circumstances, including a first-time home purchase, higher education and a few other, less common situations. The tax treatment of withdrawals differs by donor: Contributions by individuals are made on an after-tax basis, so those dollars come out tax-free. Investment gains on those contributions, however, are subject to ordinary income tax. Any dollars received from the government or other donors under the pilot program will also be subject to ordinary income tax. Should you contribute to a Trump account? The answer, as with most financial questions, is that it depends. Here’s a framework you might consider: Step 1: If your child was born between 2025 and 2028 and is thus eligible for the government contribution of $1,000, that is the easiest decision. I would head over to the new website today to get started. Step 2: Should you make contributions beyond the government’s initial $1,000? I would pause at this point to assess where your college savings stand. Since education is such a significant expense and since 529 accounts have the benefit of growing tax-free, I would prioritize college savings over a Trump account contribution. Step 3: The next account to consider is a custodial Roth IRA. If your children have any income, they can contribute to a Roth IRA. And since Roth balances grow tax-free too, I would also prioritize Roth contributions over Trump account contributions, where the growth will be taxable. Step 4: After addressing potential 529 and Roth IRA contributions, ordinarily the next savings option to consider would be a custodial taxable account—often referred to as an UTMA. But it’s at this point that you might consider a Trump account.  How should you think about this decision? While there are tax differences between UTMA accounts and Trump accounts, and there are differences in contribution limits, neither of those, in my view, should be the primary consideration. Instead, the question I’d ask is how you’d like the funds to be used, and on that point, there’s a big difference between an UTMA and a Trump account. Depending on the state, children can generally access funds in an UTMA at either age 18 or 21. If you feel your child would benefit from having some funds to help get established in the early years after college, then an UTMA might be the better choice. In contrast, Trump accounts are really designed to be retirement accounts, with only the handful of early withdrawal provisions referenced earlier. If you’d prefer to see your child’s savings grow for decades, then the Trump account might be the better choice. If you aren’t sure how to decide between a contribution to an UTMA and a Trump account, you could always split the difference. One reason to do that is because Trump accounts present an interesting tax planning opportunity. After the growth period, if a child has a Trump account balance, that balance would be eligible for a Roth conversion, whereby it would transfer over to a Roth IRA to grow tax-free. Of course, Roth conversions are taxable, but if a child is in a low tax bracket in the early years after college, the tax might be modest. I see that as a compelling reason to consider making at least some contributions to a Trump account.   Adam M. Grossman is the founder of Mayport, a fixed-fee wealth management firm. Sign up for Adam's Daily Ideas email, follow him on X @AdamMGrossman and check out his earlier articles.  
Read more »

Frittering away Frugality 

"I understand the skepticism, but there are reasons Costco works for some. Like any subscription arrangement, you have to balance the cost against savings every year for Costco (as you need to do for Amazon Prime and similar things). I have a small numbers of things I particularly like at Costco, and buy over and over for the savings - like Advil, certain breakfast cereals, Keurig pods and gas for my car. There are a handful of others. I first went there for eyeglasses - great service and much lower prices. Periodically, I buy individual things for better prices, like lawn fertilizer, printer ink, canned olives, dried mango and in the spring, plants. I don't buy much else. The eyeglasses alone saved me much more than the annual fee. Cheaper gas is always about 15-20 cents a gallon better than local stations. My gut calculations tell me I am better off each year, since I don't load up on things unnecessarily. But the Costco advantage is not a giant advantage. One thing I do notice is that Costco is also a destination for many non-profits that serve the poor. I often see people with three and four loaded carts at a time, all with essentials and no impulse item. I think that when those people load up their carts with food essentials, they should be applauded for using their contributions wisely."
- Martin McCue
Read more »

The Making of Jonathan Clements

WHEN READERS THINK of my younger brother Jonathan Clements, they often picture the longtime Wall Street Journal columnist or the founder of HumbleDollar. They remember the clear financial advice, the thoughtful essays and the quiet wisdom that helped millions make better decisions with their money. But every writer has a beginning. As I've been researching Jonathan's life over the past several weeks, I've found myself drawn less to the career everyone knows and more to the people who helped shape it. Before the books, the columns and the countless readers, there was a curious teenager discovering that he loved to write. Jonathan's journey began long before Wall Street, long before Forbes and long before HumbleDollar. It began with a school magazine at Bryanston School in Dorset, England. As a teenager, Jonathan joined the staff of Saga, the school magazine. There he wrote an article criticizing Bryanston's decision to spend money on a new pipe organ while other parts of the school needed attention. Years later, Jonathan looked back on that article with characteristic humor, saying it earned him "the enmity of a host of people." But he also said something far more revealing. That article, he believed, "was my entrée to becoming a journalist." More importantly, Jonathan had discovered not just that he enjoyed writing, but that he enjoyed asking difficult questions. Reading those early Saga articles today, what strikes me isn't simply Jonathan's talent. It's how familiar his voice already sounds. Even as a teenager, he questioned accepted wisdom with humor rather than hostility, weighed competing arguments fairly and cared deeply about priorities. Years later, readers would come to know him for helping them decide what mattered most in their financial lives. Looking back, those instincts were already there. Journalism also ran in the family. Our father began his career as a journalist before becoming an economist, and Jonathan often said his example inspired him to pursue financial journalism. After leaving Bryanston, Jonathan had almost a year before beginning his studies at Cambridge, our father's alma mater. During that time, a family friend, Mrs. Dolezal, helped him secure a reporting job at the Potomac Almanac, a small community newspaper in suburban Washington. For the next eight months, Jonathan did what young reporters often do. One day he covered education. The next, sports. Then police, then business. It wasn't glamorous work, but it taught him the fundamentals of reporting. Years later, Jonathan would describe those eight months as "the most fun and the most educational experience I had in journalism." It wasn't a large newspaper, but it gave a young reporter the opportunity to learn every aspect of the profession. Even more importantly, it introduced him to the paper's editor, Leslie Leven. Decades later, after writing for Forbes, The Wall Street Journal and founding HumbleDollar, Jonathan was asked about the people who had influenced his career. His answer surprised me. Of everyone he had worked with, he singled out Leslie, describing her as "probably the most important mentor I had." Those words say as much about Jonathan as they do about Leslie. No matter how successful he became, Jonathan never forgot the people who had believed in him before anyone else did. Cambridge came next, but by then journalism was no longer simply an interest. Jonathan later admitted that during one term he attended only four lectures because he was so immersed in editing the student newspaper, Varsity. Somewhere along the way, writing had stopped being a hobby and had become the work he wanted to spend his life doing. After Cambridge, Jonathan joined Euromoney in London, his first full-time journalism position. It was another stepping stone that eventually led him to New York and Forbes, where he discovered the world of personal finance writing. The years that followed are well known. After Forbes came nearly two decades at The Wall Street Journal, where Jonathan became one of the country's most respected personal finance columnists. He later spent six years at Citigroup as Director of Financial Education, helping investors better understand their financial lives. But the entrepreneurial spirit never left him. In 2016, he founded HumbleDollar, creating not simply another financial website, but a community built on thoughtful conversation, generosity and the belief that money is ultimately a means to a richer life, not an end in itself. Millions of readers came to trust his judgment and his remarkable ability to explain complicated ideas with clarity, humanity and compassion. Growing up, I don't think any of us could have imagined where Jonathan's curiosity and love of writing would eventually lead. He was simply my younger brother; curious, thoughtful and always eager to learn. Looking back now, the path seems almost inevitable. At the time, it was anything but. But as I've pieced together Jonathan's early years, I've come away with a different appreciation of his career. I always knew where Jonathan finished. Only recently have I begun to appreciate where, and with whom, it all began. Long before Jonathan became a mentor to countless writers and readers, someone had mentored him. A family friend opened a door. An editor patiently taught him his craft. A small community newspaper gave him a chance. We often celebrate the finished product. The successful journalist, the respected author, the trusted voice. Yet behind almost every accomplished life are people whose names are seldom remembered, people who quietly open doors, encourage talent and believe in someone long before the rest of the world notices. Jonathan never forgot them. Perhaps that's why, years later, so many aspiring writers would tell similar stories about him. He answered emails, encouraged new voices, edited with kindness and opened doors for others just as doors had once been opened for him. In the end, Jonathan's story isn't simply about becoming one of the world's most respected financial journalists. It's also about the people who quietly shaped that journey. Mrs. Dolezal opened the first door and Leslie Leven helped Jonathan find his footing as a young reporter. Those early opportunities gave him the confidence to pursue the career that followed. Every accomplished life begins somewhere. Jonathan's began with people who saw potential in a young man long before the rest of the world did.   After spending more than two decades building a successful landscaping business with his twin brother Nicholas, Andrew Clements retired in 2015 with a new appreciation for what matters most. Born in England, his essays draw on a life that has included growing up in England and Bangladesh, entrepreneurship, caregiving, family loss and travel. A regular HumbleDollar contributor, he enjoys tellingstories that remind readers life’s richest lessons often have little to do with money. Andrew is the older brother of HumbleDollar founder Jonathan Clements, whose life and legacy have inspired some of his most personal writing. He lives in Florida with his husband, Joey.
Read more »

Free Newsletter

Get Educated

Manifesto

NO. 5: WE CAN’T stop misfortune from befalling us—but we can limit the fallout by keeping emergency money, living below our means, taking on debt cautiously and buying the right insurance.

Truths

NO. 113: ACADEMICS talk about the risk-free rate—the investment return you can earn without taking any risk—and they usually point to Treasury bonds. But for you, the risk-free rate may be the sum charged by the highest-cost debt you have. Got credit card debt that's costing you 20%? That’s the risk-free rate you can earn by paying down that debt.

act

VISUALIZE YOUR goals. Daydream about the vacation cottage, new car, remodeled kitchen and what you’ll do in retirement. Why? It will make you more motivated to save and you’ll enjoy the pleasure of anticipation. It’ll also give you a chance to ponder your goals in greater detail—and you might discover, on second thought, that some aren’t so enticing.

Truths

NO. 66: TWENTY STOCKS aren’t enough. One rule says you need 20 individual stocks to be diversified. With that many, your portfolio's volatility won't be much greater than the broad market's. Problem is, you might still earn returns that differ radically from the market averages. To avoid this tracking error, you need to own hundreds of stocks.

Our favorite investment: index funds

Manifesto

NO. 5: WE CAN’T stop misfortune from befalling us—but we can limit the fallout by keeping emergency money, living below our means, taking on debt cautiously and buying the right insurance.

Spotlight: Insurance

Quinn’s last rant for 2024. Misinformation is frustrating. No, your wife is not a car!

In a previous post I outlined what I see as the dilemma Americas face when it comes to paying for health care. 
Since then I have been tracking social media comments on the topic. If the people posting are close to reflecting a significant portion of the population, we are in trouble. 
I suspect the lack of a fundamental understanding of insurance, how companies operate and individual responsibility is not limited to health issues, but also explains a lot about how people manage their finances and use the resources available to them –

Read more »

A Tale of Excess

On a recent family trip to the UK I learned something new about car rental insurance. During my many years of business travel, we were always told to turn down the collision damage waiver, or CDW, insurance offered by the rental company. Our personal credit card provides rental car insurance, but you must decline the CDW and reserve and pay with that card.
When we picked up our car hire just outside of Oxford we were pleased to see we’d been upgraded to a BMW 500 sedan. 

Read more »

Details, Details

DO YOU SKIM OVER the fine print? Two recent incidents involving insurance coverage made me rethink my tendency to do just that. One incident alerted me to a major problem. The other saved me money.
Let’s start with the problem. It was time to renew our homeowner’s insurance. In looking over the policy, something didn’t look right. In the section for dwelling, which is defined in our policy as alterations and other improvements, we had $5,000 worth of coverage.

Read more »

Choosing Life

NONE OF US WANTS to contemplate our own mortality. But we all need to think about it—including thinking about life insurance.
I was lucky enough to have a long tenure with a large company that provided term insurance at reasonable prices. My employer provided two times our salary in coverage and we had the option to purchase additional coverage equal to eight times salary. I was also able to buy insurance on my wife’s life equal to three times my salary.

Read more »

Life Sentence

WOULD YOU ADVISE someone—who doesn’t drive, doesn’t need a car and doesn’t plan to get one in the foreseeable future—to buy car insurance? I wouldn’t. But it seems some financial advisors think otherwise. That, at least, is the impression I got when an acquaintance, whom I’ll call Laura, mentioned her variable universal life insurance policy to me.
A single woman in her mid-40s, Laura has a decent income and lives on her own. She has no one other than herself to support financially.

Read more »

Works If You Can’t

BE HONEST: WHEN WAS the last time you thought about disability insurance? As co-founder of a website that sells insurance, it’s a topic I think about every day, but I realize most folks have other things on their mind. Yet becoming disabled is one of the biggest financial risks that working people face.
Disability can result from accidents or sickness and can impact people of all ages. According to the Social Security Administration, a 20-year-old entering the workforce has a one-in-four chance of becoming disabled for a year or more before retirement.

Read more »

Spotlight: Sayler

Our Chosen Road

CONSUMER REPORTS and other authorities will tell you that you get the greatest value for your car-buying dollar by purchasing a two- or three-year-old vehicle. They also often recommend selling your current car after you’ve owned it for about seven years. We favor a different strategy—one that suits our family but certainly isn’t for everybody. My wife’s No. 1 priority is that her vehicle be reliable. She insists that every time she gets in the car, it starts and delivers her to where she needs to be, with no worries along the way. To maximize the chances of that happening, we buy her a new car every eight to 10 years. She gets to drive a car largely under the manufacturer’s warranty, plus today’s cars are very reliable over their first decade. I then get her old car, and continue to drive it until some major mechanical problem crops up or the body rusts such that it’s no longer structurally safe. Once one of those things happen, she gets a new car and I once again take over her old car. This system certainly isn’t for everybody. The second driver of the car ends up with a car that’s eight to 20 years old. The final few years can be rough. The driver of the older vehicle better view a car as transportation only—because some of the amenities will stop working and won’t be worth replacing. If my wife’s heated seats stop functioning, we’ll get them fixed. If they stop working in year 10 or 12, they’re liable to stay not working. The second person also has to be willing to live with the occasional minor malfunction, like the fuel pump failing or a radiator hose bursting. I can almost guarantee that these things will happen on a dark road…
Read more »

Sleeping Well

ONE OF MY DREAMS for retirement was to take four months and hike the Continental Divide Trail. It runs along the backbone of our country, from the Mexican border to the Canadian border. It’s 3,028 miles of beautiful scenery. Alas, my wonderful wife worries about me hiking alone for months. What if I got hurt? What if I got sick? Our son uses a satellite phone on his treks to keep us up-to-date on his location. I reason that I’d be safe using a satellite phone as well. She isn’t buying that argument. Simply put, my wife can’t sleep well at night, not knowing how I’m doing. Which got us to our current compromise. She lets me go on longer hikes with a guide. That way, if I get hurt or sick, there’s somebody to make sure I get the care and attention I need. We first tried this compromise in 2018, when I joined a group walking the West Highland Way in Scotland. And, to be honest, I really enjoyed it. Instead of sleeping in a tent every night, we walked from guesthouse to guesthouse. Our baggage was ferried between our lodgings. I slept in a real bed every night. I ate a hot pub meal every evening. It really was the best of all worlds. I enjoyed it so much that I recently hiked the Coast to Coast Walk in England. It’s 192-miles long and passes through three national parks. Apart from the wonderful scenery, the camaraderie, the beds and pub grub, I enjoyed disconnecting from “the real world” for two weeks. No Wall Street Journal. No closing bell update. Not caring what the Fed is signaling. I’m able to unplug because I’ve heeded Warren Buffett’s advice to “only buy something that you’d be perfectly happy to hold…
Read more »

Showing an Interest

WHILE VISITING MY mother, I walked along my old paper route. It made me wonder: Which customer am I? It helps to have a little background on these long-ago entrepreneurs. Paper carriers were independent contractors with the local newspaper. We were given a territory—the route. We purchased the papers from the newspaper company and then delivered them to our customers. Every other week, we would also go around to our customers and ask for payment for the preceding two weeks. When they paid us, we gave them a tiny, preprinted receipt. Of my 60 customers, I remember only two clearly. Neither was really a bad customer, but I remember the two extremes—my favorite customer and the one that caused me headaches. Mrs. Kramer was my favorite customer. She was almost always home when I was collecting money. She usually rounded up her bill by a quarter or 30 cents. If she was going out of town for a few days, she would pay two weeks ahead. When I next collected after her return home, we’d settle up the difference for the days she was gone. Mrs. Kramer always asked how I was doing in school or Scouts. On winter days, she would offer me hot cocoa. I never took her up on the offer, but it was nice knowing she was thinking about me. In December, she usually gave me a tip of $2 or $3. My least favorite customer was the doctor. The doctor’s family was seldom at home. I often extended them credit for eight or even 12 weeks of newspapers. Even as I waited to collect from the doctor, I was paying the newspaper company. When I was able to collect, we settled up for the exact amount due. In December, the doctor would usually give me…
Read more »

Failure Is an Option

I RECENTLY LISTENED to author JL Collins on the Bogleheads Live podcast. Collins mentioned several times that stock declines never last. He isn’t alone in this assertion. You can read any number of books or articles that talk about the need to remain invested during stock market downturns because the market always recovers. Perhaps it’s my training as an engineer. We’re taught to think about failure rates and probabilities of failure—which brings me to an uncomfortable notion: Just because the U.S. stock market hasn’t yet failed to recover doesn’t mean it’ll always recover. There are cases where the entire stock market has disappeared. Think Russia in 1918, Romania and Czechoslovakia in 1948, or Cuba in 1960. It can also take a very long time for the stock market to recover—so long that many investors would give up or die before recouping their losses. It took the Taiwan stock market 17 years to return to its 2000 peak and the U.S. market 25 years to regain its 1929 peak. Meanwhile, the Japanese stock market hasn’t yet returned to its year-end 1989 all-time high. That’s 33 years and counting. To be sure, if stock investors reinvest their dividends, they’d be made whole much sooner. Unfortunately, reinvesting dividends may not be possible for retirees living off their investments. Let me be clear: I’m not predicting wholesale confiscation, as happened in communist countries. I’m also not predicting a prolonged bear market. I personally remain significantly invested in global stock markets, with a heavy tilt toward the U.S. My only point is that market participants get rewarded for taking risk. There’s some small risk that a particular stock market will provide no price appreciation for decades—and perhaps even decline to zero.
Read more »

Home Free

MY SON AND HIS fiancée recently purchased their first home. They’ve asked me about things like how to fix a leaky faucet, but they haven’t asked me for financial advice—which is a good thing, because I’ve had very limited experience buying houses. You see, my wife and I bought our first and only home in 1986. We paid $89,000, putting down $20,000 and taking out a $72,000 mortgage by the time we added in points, fees, taxes and the myriad other costs associated with a loan closing. Our interest rate was 8.5%. We knew that we wanted to pay off the house early, so we started making extra principal payments. We also refinanced our mortgage twice as rates dropped. The upshot: We paid off the mortgage in 11 years. But were we financially smart to do so? Remember, this was at the beginning of a long bull market. By paying the mortgage off early, we avoided some $88,000 in interest payments over what would have been the full life of the mortgage. That’s before factoring in the tax deduction for mortgage interest. If you figure that in, the savings might have been $65,000. Had we had taken the $231.32 per month in extra principal we were paying on our mortgage—equal to more than $30,000 over 11 years—and instead directed it into the S&P 500, that $30,000 would have grown to $75,000 over the course of those 11 years. Throw in perhaps another $8,000 in dividends, and our $30,000 would have been worth $83,000 before taxes, and the sum would have continued to grow from there. Or, to put it another way, the 8.5% interest rate we avoided, which was even less after our two refinancings, was well below the return we could have earned in the stock market. To be…
Read more »

Buy What You Value

IN A RECENT BLOG post, I mentioned a coworker’s Lexus. One commenter—none other than fellow HumbleDollar contributor Dick Quinn—noted that, while “there is no logical reason” the coworker needed a Lexus, he might have motivations I didn’t know about. I didn’t mean to imply my coworker had made an imprudent choice. I spent my career working with engineers and scientists. As a group, we were well paid. We could afford pretty much anything we wanted—just not everything we wanted. I’ve had friends purchase $15,000 custom-made carbon bicycles, buy $1,000 bamboo flyfishing rods and spend thousands making a Christmas village that’s on display for two months a year. While I personally don’t value those items enough to spend that sort of money on them, my friends all earned enough that they could afford to do so. They enjoy their hobbies, and spend countless hours biking, fishing and modeling. While I tend toward frugality, there are two expenditures I make that some of my friends would not choose to make. The first was our family vacations. Every year, our entire family took a vacation. Some years, it was camping in our western national parks. Some years, it was going to a warm southern state in the middle of our long Minnesota winters. But every few years, it would be outside the continental U.S. Our children have accompanied us on trips to Alaska, Hawaii, Quebec, Ireland, France and Italy. While some friends would take their spouse or partner on an overseas trip, a few expressed surprise that we’d take our children, especially when they were younger. These friends would tell me that the kids wouldn’t appreciate the experience or that they’d never remember the trip. I don’t buy those arguments. But even if they’re true, it wouldn’t matter. I worked with my colleagues…
Read more »